Việc phân bổ ngân sách công cho cơ sở hạ tầng giao thông, cụ thể là giữa đường xá và hệ thống giao thông công cộng, là một vấn đề gây tranh cãi. Một số người cho rằng nên ưu tiên đầu tư vào các con đường và xa lộ, trong khi những người khác tin rằng hệ thống giao thông công cộng cần được chú trọng hơn. Bài viết này sẽ thảo luận cả hai quan điểm và bày tỏ ý kiến cá nhân. Dưới đây là bài viết hoàn chỉnh từ IELTS Meister bao gồm phần giới thiệu, phân tích đề bài, cấu trúc bài viết, và ba bài mẫu cho đề bài “Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”.
1. Phân Tích Đề Bài
Đề bài:
“Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”
Dạng câu hỏi:
Opinion Essay (Bài luận bày tỏ quan điểm)
Yêu cầu:
Đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân về việc ưu tiên chi tiêu cho cơ sở hạ tầng đường xá hay hệ thống giao thông công cộng.
2. Cấu Trúc Bài Viết
Introduction (Mở bài)
Giới thiệu vấn đề và nêu rõ quan điểm của bạn.
Body Paragraph 1 (Thân bài 1)
Lập luận ủng hộ việc đầu tư vào đường xá và xa lộ.
Body Paragraph 2 (Thân bài 2)
Lập luận ủng hộ việc đầu tư vào hệ thống giao thông công cộng.
Conclusion (Kết bài)
Tóm tắt ý kiến của bạn và đưa ra kết luận.
3. Bài Mẫu 1
Introduction
The allocation of funds for transportation infrastructure is a contentious topic. While some argue that investing in roads and motorways is more crucial, I believe that prioritizing public transport systems is a better long-term solution for addressing urban congestion and environmental concerns.
Body Paragraph 1
Those who support spending on roads and motorways emphasize the immediate benefits to commuters and businesses. Well-maintained roads facilitate the efficient movement of goods and services, which can boost economic productivity. Additionally, expanding and upgrading motorways can alleviate traffic congestion, making daily commutes faster and more convenient. In rural or less accessible areas, roads are often the primary means of transportation, and investments in this infrastructure can greatly improve connectivity and quality of life for residents.
Body Paragraph 2
However, I believe that investing in public transport systems is more beneficial in the long term. Well-developed public transit networks can reduce traffic congestion and minimize air pollution by encouraging people to use buses, trains, or trams instead of private vehicles. This shift can have a significant positive impact on the environment, especially in urban areas where vehicle emissions contribute heavily to air quality problems. Furthermore, efficient public transportation can be more cost-effective for commuters and promote social equity, ensuring that even those who cannot afford a car have access to reliable transportation. Cities like Tokyo and London demonstrate how robust public transport can lead to more sustainable and livable urban environments.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while investing in roads and motorways is important for economic growth and accessibility, I believe that prioritizing public transport systems is a more sustainable approach. It addresses environmental concerns, reduces congestion, and promotes equal access to transportation, benefiting society as a whole.
Tham Khảo Các Bài IELTS WRITING TASK 2 Tương Tự Tại Đây:
Leaders and Directors in an Organisation Are Normally Older People
When asked to choose between a life without work and working most of the time
Some People Think That Hosting an International Sports Event Is Good for the Country
4. Bài Mẫu 2
Introduction
The debate over whether governments should prioritize spending on roads and motorways or on public transportation systems is ongoing. Although roads and motorways are essential for certain aspects of economic growth, I argue that investing in public transport systems has more significant long-term advantages.
Body Paragraph 1
Proponents of investing in roads and motorways highlight their role in supporting economic activity. Businesses depend on efficient road networks to transport goods quickly and cost-effectively. Additionally, in many regions, roads are the primary means of transportation, making them critical for everyday commuting and emergency services. Improvements in road infrastructure can also reduce traffic congestion in heavily populated areas, potentially saving time and reducing fuel consumption for drivers. Therefore, investing in roads and motorways can yield tangible, immediate benefits.
Body Paragraph 2
Nevertheless, the advantages of prioritizing public transport cannot be overlooked. Developing comprehensive and efficient public transit systems can significantly alleviate urban congestion by reducing the number of private vehicles on the road. This not only improves air quality but also decreases the overall carbon footprint, addressing climate change concerns. Furthermore, reliable public transportation promotes social inclusion by providing affordable travel options for all members of society, regardless of income level. Cities like Singapore have shown how investments in public transit can enhance urban livability and make commuting more convenient and sustainable.
Conclusion
Overall, while roads and motorways are vital for economic activities and rural connectivity, I believe that public transport investments should take precedence. The environmental and social benefits of well-developed public transit systems are far-reaching and essential for building sustainable cities.
5. Bài Mẫu 3
“Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”
Introduction
How best to allocate funds between roads and public transportation is a significant challenge for policymakers. While some argue that roads and motorways deserve more investment, I disagree and believe that focusing on public transport systems yields greater long-term benefits.
Body Paragraph 1
Supporters of road and motorway investment often argue that a well-maintained road network is crucial for a country’s economic infrastructure. Roads facilitate the smooth movement of goods and people, which can enhance trade and daily commuting. Moreover, road expansions and upgrades can immediately reduce traffic congestion in urban areas. For rural regions, roads are often indispensable for connecting remote communities to essential services. Thus, investing in roads is necessary for both economic and social development.
Body Paragraph 2
Despite these arguments, investing in public transportation is more advantageous overall. Public transit systems help reduce the reliance on private cars, which is vital for lowering greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change. Additionally, public transportation eases traffic congestion more effectively than simply expanding road networks, as it offers a sustainable alternative for large populations. Affordable and efficient public transit also ensures that transportation is accessible to everyone, which can help bridge the gap between different socioeconomic groups. Cities that have invested heavily in public transport, such as Amsterdam and New York, have seen long-term improvements in quality of life and environmental health.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while roads and motorways are important, I firmly believe that prioritizing public transportation systems is a smarter investment. It leads to a more sustainable future, reduces congestion, and promotes greater social equity, making cities more livable and environmentally friendly.
Tổng Kết
Qua bài viết trên chúng ta có thể thấy cả bả ba bài mẫu đều đưa ra các lập luận về tầm quan trọng của việc đầu tư vào đường xá và giao thông công cộng. Nhưng đều nghiêng về việc ủng hộ hệ thống giao thông công cộng vì lợi ích bền vững và toàn diện hơn cho xã hội trong đề tài “Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”
