Một số người cho rằng các tổ chức từ thiện nên tập trung vào những người dân bản địa, trong khi những người khác cho rằng họ nên hỗ trợ những người cần giúp đỡ nhất ở bất cứ nơi nào. Quan điểm này xuất phát từ nhiều lý do và có những ưu điểm, hạn chế riêng. “Some people say charities should help people who are in the greatest need no matter where they live, while some others say they should focus on people in their country.”. Bài viết này từ IELTS Meister sẽ thảo luận cả hai quan điểm và đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân.
1. Phân Tích Đề Bài
Đề bài:
Some people say charities should help people who are in the greatest need no matter where they live, while some others say they should focus on people in their country.
Dạng câu hỏi:
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Yêu cầu:
Thảo luận hai quan điểm về việc tổ chức từ thiện nên hỗ trợ tất cả những người cần giúp đỡ hay tập trung vào người bản địa, và đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân.
Từ khóa chính:
- Charities (tổ chức từ thiện)
- Greatest need (cần giúp đỡ nhất)
- No matter where they live (ở bất cứ nơi nào)
- Focus on people in their country (tập trung vào người trong nước)
2. Cấu Trúc Bài Viết
“Some people say charities should help people who are in the greatest need no matter where they live, while some others say they should focus on people in their country.”
Introduction (Giới Thiệu)
- Giới thiệu về tranh cãi xung quanh việc các tổ chức từ thiện nên giúp đỡ tất cả mọi người hay tập trung vào trong nước.
- Đề cập rằng bài viết sẽ thảo luận cả hai quan điểm và đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân.
Body Paragraph 1 (Thân bài 1)
- Trình bày quan điểm rằng từ thiện nên giúp những người cần nhất ở bất cứ đâu.
Body Paragraph 2 (Thân bài 2)
- Trình bày quan điểm rằng từ thiện nên tập trung vào người trong nước.
Conclusion (Kết bài)
- Tóm tắt cả hai quan điểm và nêu rõ ý kiến cá nhân.
3. Bài Mẫu 1
“Some people say charities should help people who are in the greatest need no matter where they live, while some others say they should focus on people in their country.”
Introduction
Charities play a critical role in supporting those in need, and there is ongoing debate about whether they should assist people regardless of their location or focus solely on their own country’s citizens. This essay will discuss both perspectives and argue that while international aid is important, prioritizing local support is more effective.
Body Paragraph 1
Some people believe that charities should prioritize those in the most need, regardless of geographic location. They argue that many developing countries face severe issues such as poverty, famine, and lack of access to clean water, where the need for aid is often greater. By focusing on these areas, charities can potentially make a significant impact and help save lives. Furthermore, they contend that compassion should extend beyond borders, especially in an increasingly globalized world where interdependence among nations is evident. For instance, organizations like Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) provide critical medical support in war zones, highlighting the universal obligation to help those in urgent need.
Body Paragraph 2
However, others argue that charities should concentrate their efforts on helping people within their own country. They believe that addressing local issues can create stronger, more resilient communities, which in turn benefits society as a whole. Additionally, by focusing on local needs, charities may have a better understanding of the specific issues affecting people and can offer more targeted and sustainable solutions. This view also stems from the idea that citizens’ contributions to charities should primarily benefit those closer to home, as this encourages a sense of shared responsibility and national solidarity. For example, food banks and homeless shelters often rely on local donations and volunteer efforts to provide essential services to those in need within the community.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while international assistance is vital for addressing global crises, I believe charities should primarily focus on supporting local communities. This approach allows for more sustainable, impactful support and fosters a greater sense of unity and responsibility within a nation.
Tham Khảo Các Bài WRITING TASK 2 tương Tự Tại Đây:
Nowadays Parents Put Too Much Pressure on Their Children to Succeed.
In Many Countries Today Major Cities Have Become Too Big and Overcrowded. Why Is This?
People in Many Countries Spend More and More Time Far Away from Their Families.
4. Bài Mẫu 2
“Some people say charities should help people who are in the greatest need no matter where they live, while some others say they should focus on people in their country.”
Introduction
The question of whether charities should help people globally or focus on their own country has sparked debate. While some argue that aid should go to those in the greatest need, regardless of location, others believe that supporting local communities is more effective. This essay will examine both perspectives and offer my view.
Body Paragraph 1
Those who support international charity work argue that need, rather than location, should determine where help is directed. In many cases, people in impoverished nations face extreme hardships such as malnutrition, disease, and lack of access to basic necessities. By extending help globally, charities can reach those who may lack essential resources or government support. Supporters of this view argue that in a globalized world, we have a moral responsibility to assist others, irrespective of borders. For instance, international charities that provide disaster relief can save thousands of lives, showcasing the value of global aid.
Body Paragraph 2
Conversely, others believe that charitable efforts should focus primarily on domestic needs. They argue that charities operating within their own country are better equipped to understand the unique social and economic issues facing their citizens. Additionally, focusing locally can make charity work more transparent and accountable to the donors who support them. This approach can also foster a stronger community spirit and help address problems that impact the donor population directly, such as homelessness, unemployment, and poverty. Local charities, like community food programs and shelters, play an important role in alleviating these issues and provide more direct benefits to the people supporting them.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while helping those in dire need around the world is essential, I believe that focusing on domestic issues can lead to more effective and sustainable outcomes. By prioritizing local support, charities can address pressing problems within their own societies, building stronger and more resilient communities.
5. Bài Mẫu 3
“Some people say charities should help people who are in the greatest need no matter where they live, while some others say they should focus on people in their country.”
Introduction
There is a debate over whether charities should assist those in need, regardless of where they are, or focus on supporting their own country’s citizens. This essay will discuss both perspectives and argue that while international support is commendable, prioritizing local charity work is often more practical.
Body Paragraph 1
Supporters of global charity work argue that the severity of needs should guide where assistance goes, not geographic boundaries. In many developing countries, people struggle with issues like extreme poverty, lack of healthcare, and limited access to education. By extending help to these regions, charities can address urgent humanitarian needs and create significant improvements in people’s lives. Moreover, advocates of this view believe that charity should be rooted in compassion for all of humanity, transcending borders. Global organizations like UNICEF, for example, work tirelessly to improve children’s welfare worldwide, embodying the belief in universal assistance.
Body Paragraph 2
On the other hand, many people argue that charity should focus on helping those within the same country. They believe that addressing local needs leads to a stronger, healthier society, as resources are directed to issues that impact the donor community directly. Furthermore, local charities often understand cultural nuances and specific challenges, allowing them to implement tailored, effective solutions. This approach also reinforces a sense of unity and shared responsibility within a nation, fostering goodwill and cooperation. For instance, charities that address homelessness, support food banks, or provide educational opportunities can make a substantial difference in local communities, directly benefiting both recipients and contributors.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while there is value in helping people globally, I believe that charities should prioritize supporting their own country’s citizens. Focusing on local needs allows for a more targeted approach and builds a stronger sense of community, which is essential for long-term social development.
6. Lưu Ý Khi Viết Bài
- Phân tích kỹ các yếu tố cần thiết cho cả hai quan điểm:
Cân nhắc các lý do và tác động của từng cách tiếp cận. - Đưa ra lập luận rõ ràng và cân nhắc hợp lý:
Đưa ra các ví dụ và giải thích kỹ lý do để lập luận của bạn thêm thuyết phục. - Sử dụng từ vựng phù hợp với chủ đề từ thiện:
Ví dụ như “humanitarian aid,” “local charities,” “community support,” và “global assistance.”
7. Tổng Kết
“Some people say charities should help people who are in the greatest need no matter where they live, while some others say they should focus on people in their country.”. Việc hỗ trợ những người cần giúp đỡ ở bất kỳ nơi nào trên thế giới là quan trọng. Nhưng việc tập trung vào việc hỗ trợ người dân trong nước cũng mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn. Việc tập trung vào các vấn đề trong nước sẽ giúp tổ chức từ thiện hoạt động hiệu quả hơn và góp phần xây dựng một cộng đồng gắn kết và bền vững hơn.
