Quan điểm về bảo tồn loài đang gây nhiều tranh cãi. Một số người tin rằng tất cả động vật hoang dã cần được bảo vệ, trong khi những người khác tin rằng chỉ một số loài nhất định cần được bảo vệ. “Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.”. Trong bài viết này IELTS Meister sẽ phân tích cả hai ý kiến và đưa ra quan điểm của mình về vấn đề này.
1. Phân Tích Đề Bài
Đề bài:
Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Dạng câu hỏi:
Discussion + Opinion (thảo luận hai quan điểm và đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân).
Yêu cầu:
- Trình bày ý tưởng tin rằng tất cả các loài động vật hoang dã cần được bảo vệ.
- Trình bày ý tưởng rằng chỉ một số loài động vật nhất định cần được bảo vệ.
- Hãy cho biết ý kiến cá nhân của bạn xem quan điểm nào hợp lý hơn.
Từ khóa chính:
- Wild animals (động vật hoang dã)
- Protected (bảo vệ)
2. Cấu Trúc Bài Viết
Introduction (Mở bài)
- Giới thiệu về chủ đề và 2 quan điểm sẽ được đề cập.
- Hãy chia sẻ ý kiến cá nhân của bạn về chủ đề này.
Body Paragraph 1 (Quan điểm ủng hộ bảo vệ tất cả động vật hoang dã)
- Giải thích tại sao một số người cho rằng tất cả động vật hoang dã cần được bảo vệ.
- Ví dụ: vai trò của đa dạng sinh học trong hệ sinh thái và ảnh hưởng của con người.
Body Paragraph 2 (Quan điểm chỉ bảo vệ một số loài nhất định)
- Giải thích tại sao một số người cho rằng chỉ những loài có nguy cơ tuyệt chủng mới cần được bảo vệ.
- Ví dụ, những hạn chế về nguồn lực và hiệu quả của việc tập trung vào các loài có nguy cơ tuyệt chủng.
Conclusion (Kết bài)
- Hãy tóm tắt cả hai quan điểm và đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân của bạn.
3. Bài Mẫu 1
“Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.”
Introduction
The debate over whether all wild animals should be protected or only a select few has sparked considerable discussion. Some argue for the comprehensive protection of all wildlife, while others believe conservation efforts should focus on species under severe threat. In my opinion, while it is essential to prioritize endangered species, the overall protection of wildlife is crucial for ecological balance.
Body Paragraph 1
Supporters of protecting all wild animals emphasize the importance of biodiversity. They argue that each species plays a unique role in maintaining ecological balance. For instance, predators like wolves control the population of herbivores, preventing overgrazing and ensuring the sustainability of vegetation. Additionally, protecting all wildlife helps to maintain genetic diversity, which is essential for the resilience of ecosystems in the face of environmental changes. Human activities, such as deforestation and pollution, have already caused significant damage to natural habitats, making comprehensive conservation efforts more necessary than ever.
Body Paragraph 2
On the other hand, some people believe that conservation resources should be directed toward species that are critically endangered. Given the limited funding and manpower available for wildlife protection, focusing on species that are most at risk ensures the most efficient use of resources. For example, organizations like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) often prioritize high-risk species like the giant panda or the Javan rhino. These targeted efforts can prevent extinctions and allow conservationists to allocate resources effectively. Furthermore, protecting keystone species, which have a disproportionately large impact on their ecosystems, can indirectly benefit many other animals and plants.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while prioritizing endangered species can be an effective conservation strategy, I believe that all wild animals deserve protection. Biodiversity as a whole supports the health of our planet, and neglecting less vulnerable species could have unforeseen ecological consequences. Therefore, a balanced approach that emphasizes endangered species but does not entirely disregard the protection of other wildlife would be ideal.
Tham Khảo Các Bài Writing Task 2 Tương Tự Tại Đây:
Scientists Agree That Many People Eat Too Much Junk Food and It Is Damaging Their Health.
Experts claim that if older people do more exercise they will be healthier and happier.
4. Bài Mẫu 2
“Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.”
Introduction
The question of whether we should protect all wild animals or only focus on a few species is a topic of significant debate. Some advocate for the comprehensive protection of all wildlife, while others argue that limited resources should be used to save only the most endangered animals. This essay will explore both perspectives and present my own view on the matter.
Body Paragraph 1
Those who support protecting all wild animals argue that every species is valuable and contributes to the ecosystem. Biodiversity ensures the stability of the environment, and the loss of even a single species can have a ripple effect throughout the food chain. Moreover, many wild animals face indirect threats, such as habitat loss and climate change, which affect entire ecosystems rather than individual species. By protecting all wildlife, we can create a more holistic approach to conservation. For example, national parks and wildlife reserves that protect various species also promote tourism, which can generate revenue for conservation efforts and support local economies.
Body Paragraph 2
Conversely, some people believe that conservation efforts should be focused on species facing imminent extinction. The rationale is that resources such as money, manpower, and research are finite and should be used strategically. Protecting iconic species, like tigers or elephants, not only raises public awareness but also creates umbrella protection for many other organisms that share their habitat. Additionally, some species are critical to the survival of ecosystems, and losing them would have devastating consequences. Critics of widespread protection argue that spreading resources too thinly may result in the failure to save any species effectively.
Conclusion
To sum up, while there is merit in prioritizing endangered species, I believe a more inclusive approach is necessary to maintain ecological balance. Protecting all wildlife helps ensure a healthy and sustainable environment, benefiting both humans and animals in the long term. However, strategic resource allocation remains vital to address the most urgent conservation challenges.
5. Bài Mẫu 3
“Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.”
Introduction
Wildlife conservation is a contentious issue, with some advocating for the protection of all wild animals and others suggesting that efforts should be limited to a few critical species. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my viewpoint on the necessity of a balanced conservation strategy.
Body Paragraph 1
Proponents of protecting all wild animals argue that biodiversity is crucial for a healthy planet. Each species, no matter how insignificant it may seem, plays a role in maintaining the balance of ecosystems. For example, pollinators like bees and butterflies are vital for plant reproduction and food crop production. Furthermore, the interconnectedness of ecosystems means that the extinction of one species can lead to a domino effect, endangering many others. Therefore, a comprehensive approach to wildlife protection helps to safeguard the natural world and preserve it for future generations.
Body Paragraph 2
On the other side of the argument, some believe that conservation should focus on species most at risk of extinction. The logic behind this is that with limited resources, prioritizing high-risk animals ensures a more efficient use of funds and manpower. Efforts like breeding programs and habitat restoration are expensive and time-consuming, and it makes sense to direct them where they are most needed. Additionally, protecting flagship species, such as the African elephant, can have a cascading effect by also preserving the habitats and other organisms that coexist with them.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while concentrating on endangered species can yield significant short-term results, I am of the opinion that a more comprehensive strategy is necessary. By protecting all wild animals, we help to maintain ecological balance and ensure that entire ecosystems remain intact. Ultimately, a combination of prioritizing critical species while also supporting broader wildlife protection initiatives would be the most effective approach for long-term environmental sustainability.
Tổng Kết
Ba bài viết mẫu đã thảo luận hai quan điểm về bảo tồn động vật hoang dã, nhấn mạnh tầm quan trọng của các chiến lược bảo tồn cân bằng. Điều này giúp duy trì sự ổn định của hệ sinh thái và ngăn chặn các loài quan trọng bị tuyệt chủng. Mong bạn đã có được những kiến thức cần thiết cho topic “Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.”.
