Some people think that mobile phone should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and on public transport. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Phân tích đề bài tiếng Việt:
“Dù một số người cho rằng điện thoại di động nên bị cấm ở nơi công cộng như thư viện, cửa hàng và phương tiện công cộng. Bạn đồng tình đến mức nào hoặc không đồng tình với tuyên bố này?”
Outline:
a. Giới thiệu (Introduction):
- Giới thiệu chủ đề và đưa ra quan điểm của bạn (agree/disagree).
- Nêu lý do lựa chọn quan điểm này.
b. Lập luận 1 (Argument 1 – Agree):
- Lý do 1 cho sự đồng tình (ví dụ: tạo sự yên tĩnh, giảm sự xao lẫn).
- Thể hiện quan điểm đồng tình và cung cấp ví dụ cụ thể.
c. Lập luận 2 (Argument 2 – Disagree):
- Lý do 1 cho sự không đồng tình (ví dụ: quyền tự do cá nhân, tiện ích).
- Thể hiện quan điểm không đồng tình và cung cấp ví dụ cụ thể.
d. Giới thiệu ý kiến cá nhân (Personal Opinion):
- Tóm tắt lý do bạn đồng tình hoặc không đồng tình.
e. Kết luận (Conclusion):
- Tóm tắt các điểm chính.
- Đưa ra lời khuyên hoặc suy nghĩ cá nhân.
Sample IELTS Writing Task 2
IELTS Writing Task 2 Some people think that mobile phone should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and on public transport. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Mobile phones have become an integral part of our daily lives, offering convenience, connectivity, and information at our fingertips. The debate over whether mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and on public transport is a contentious issue. In this essay, I will argue against the complete ban of mobile phones in public places.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the potential disruptions that mobile phones may cause. There is no denying that in some cases, loud phone conversations or constant notification sounds in quiet environments like libraries can be annoying. However, this does not mean that a complete ban is necessary. Instead, public awareness campaigns and strict guidelines on phone etiquette can be more effective in managing such behavior.
On the other hand, mobile phones provide essential services, especially in cases of emergencies. Banning them entirely in public places can lead to problems when people need to call for help, report crimes, or get assistance. Furthermore, in shops and on public transport, mobile phones offer convenience for payments and navigation. In this digital age, they have become an essential tool for many individuals.
In conclusion, while it is important to address the potential disturbances caused by mobile phones in public places, an outright ban is not the solution. Instead, a balance can be struck through public awareness, etiquette education, and the recognition of the invaluable services that mobile phones provide. It is crucial to consider the convenience and safety aspects that mobile phones offer before deciding to ban them completely.
Collocations, giải thích
- Integral part (phần không thể thiếu): Mobile phones have become an integral part of modern life.
- Contentious issue (vấn đề gây tranh cãi): The ban on mobile phones in public places is a contentious issue.
- Potential disruptions (sự gây phiền hà tiềm ẩn): Mobile phones may cause potential disruptions in quiet environments.
- Phone etiquette (qui tắc ứng xử khi sử dụng điện thoại): People should be educated about proper phone etiquette.
- Outright ban (cấm hoàn toàn): An outright ban on mobile phones is not the solution.
- Strike a balance (đạt được sự cân bằng): We should strive to strike a balance between freedom and safety.
